Animations are superior to static images.
- They allow complete visulaization of motion rather than using arrows or motion indicators
- People may not process visuals as well as we think they can.
Rehearsal Strategies
- memorizing, recitation
- tying new info to prior knowledge
- confirming comprehension
Both static and dynamic visuals are effective, particularly in learning factual information. Dynamic visuals are more effective in problem solving and comprehension.
Animations are superior to static images. They allow complete visulaization of motion rather than using arrows or motion indicators. However, people may not process visuals as well as we think they can. According to Lewalter's Experimental Study, both static and dynamic visuals are effective in teaching and learning, particularly in learning factual information. Dynamic visuals are more effective in problem solving and comprehension.
It seems to me that dynamic visuals are able to create that simulated world that allows students to explore ideas and experiment with theories and possible solutions. Even if the dynamic visuals are not interactive, they allow students a more authentic, concrete experience. When students are not able to experience the real thing first-hand, dynamic visuals can provide a close an alternative.
We want our students to be problem-solvers and to have deep comprehension of concepts we are teaching. When students are learning basic facts, it may be more cost and time effective to use static visuals. Lewalter's study showed these are sufficient for this kind of learning. However, when deeper comprehension is desired, and particularly when problem solving and critical thinking are our educational goals, it may be worth the time and cost to provide a more concrete, dynamic learning experience.
No comments:
Post a Comment